ON RELEVANCE FILTERING FOR REAL-TIME TWEET SUMMARIZATION

Real-time tweet summarization systems (RTS) require mechanisms for capturing relevant tweets, identifying novel tweets, and capturing timely tweets. In this thesis, we tackle the RTS problem with a main focus on the relevance filtering. We experimented with different traditional retrieval models. Additionally, we propose two extensions to alleviate the sparsity and topic drift challenges that affect the relevance filtering. For the sparsity, we propose leveraging word embeddings in Vector Space model (VSM) term weighting to empower the system to use semantic similarity alongside the lexical matching. To mitigate the effect of topic drift, we exploit explicit relevance feedback to enhance profile representation to cope with its development in the stream over time. We conducted extensive experiments over three standard English TREC test collections that were built specifically for RTS. Although the extensions do not generally exhibit better performance, they are comparable to the baselines used. Moreover, we extended an event detection Arabic tweets test collection, called EveTAR, to support tasks that require novelty in the system's output. We collected novelty judgments using in-house annotators and used the collection to test our RTS system. We report preliminary results on EveTAR using different models of the RTS system.This work was made possible by NPRP grants # NPRP 7-1313-1-245 and # NPRP 7-1330-2-483 from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation)

LOCATION MENTION PREDICTION FROM DISASTER TWEETS

While utilizing Twitter data for crisis management is of interest to different response authorities, a critical challenge that hinders the utilization of such data is the scarcity of automated tools that extract and resolve geolocation information. This dissertation focuses on the Location Mention Prediction (LMP) problem that consists of Location Mention Recognition (LMR) and Location Mention Disambiguation (LMD) tasks. Our work contributes to studying two main factors that influence the robustness of LMP systems: (i) the dataset used to train the model, and (ii) the learning model. As for the training dataset, we study the best training and evaluation strategies to exploit existing datasets and tools at the onset of disaster events. We emphasize that the size of training data matters and recommend considering the data domain, the disaster domain, and geographical proximity when training LMR models. We further construct the public IDRISI datasets, the largest to date English and first Arabic datasets for the LMP tasks. Rigorous analysis and experiments show that the IDRISI datasets are diverse, and domain and geographically generalizable, compared to existing datasets. As for the learning models, the LMP tasks are understudied in the disaster management domain. To address this, we reformulate the LMR and LMD modeling and evaluation to better suit the requirements of the response authorities. Moreover, we introduce competitive and state-of-the-art LMR and LMD models that are compared against a representative set of baselines for both Arabic and English languages

Overview of CheckThat! 2020: Automatic Identification and Verification of Claims in Social Media

We present an overview of the third edition of the CheckThat! Lab at CLEF 2020. The lab featured five tasks in two different languages: English and Arabic. The first four tasks compose the full pipeline of claim verification in social media: Task 1 on check-worthiness estimation, Task 2 on retrieving previously fact-checked claims, Task 3 on evidence retrieval, and Task 4 on claim verification. The lab is completed with Task 5 on check-worthiness estimation in political debates and speeches. A total of 67 teams registered to participate in the lab (up from 47 at CLEF 2019), and 23 of them actually submitted runs (compared to 14 at CLEF 2019). Most teams used deep neural networks based on BERT, LSTMs, or CNNs, and achieved sizable improvements over the baselines on all tasks. Here we describe the tasks setup, the evaluation results, and a summary of the approaches used by the participants, and we discuss some lessons learned. Last but not least, we release to the research community all datasets from the lab as well as the evaluation scripts, which should enable further research in the important tasks of check-worthiness estimation and automatic claim verification.Comment: Check-Worthiness Estimation, Fact-Checking, Veracity, Evidence-based Verification, Detecting Previously Fact-Checked Claims, Social Media Verification, Computational Journalism, COVID-1

Overview of CheckThat! 2020: Automatic Identification and Verification of Claims in Social Media

We present an overview of the third edition of the CheckThat! Lab at CLEF 2020. The lab featured five tasks in two different languages: English and Arabic. The first four tasks compose the full pipeline of claim verification in social media: Task 1 on check-worthiness estimation, Task 2 on retrieving previously fact-checked claims, Task 3 on evidence retrieval, and Task 4 on claim verification. The lab is completed with Task 5 on check-worthiness estimation in political debates and speeches. A total of 67 teams registered to participate in the lab (up from 47 at CLEF 2019), and 23 of them actually submitted runs (compared to 14 at CLEF 2019). Most teams used deep neural networks based on BERT, LSTMs, or CNNs, and achieved sizable improvements over the baselines on all tasks. Here we describe the tasks setup, the evaluation results, and a summary of the approaches used by the participants, and we discuss some lessons learned. Last but not least, we release to the research community all datasets from the lab as well as the evaluation scripts, which should enable further research in the important tasks of check-worthiness estimation and automatic claim verification